| Guiding Thought Question: Read through the different cases regarding the Endangered Species Act (Choose one from HERE) and give a brief synopsis of how the Supreme Court got involved in the protection of species. Also give a quick summary of how the court ruled. Today's Learning Objective: Students will examine the role of the Supreme Court, how it functions, and its specific powers, and will look at the methods the courts use to influence the political laws of the United States. Students will complete a research project to examine the rights that were protected by a specific Supreme Court Case. |  |
|
27 Comments
Caitlin
10/8/2018 07:42:52 am
Anderson
10/8/2018 07:44:04 am
NAT’L ASSOC. OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE. EPA transfer water pollutants regulations from national to state. Defenders of Wildlife argued that this broke the ESA requirement of consulting with federal government to not jeopardize any endangered species. Ruled that it applied only to discretionary agency action, so it did not apply.
Ethan
10/8/2018 07:47:13 am
The case that i did was the navy sonar vs the whales. Basically people were trying to say that the sonar was hurting the whales and the supreme court was the one that had the final say in it. The supreme court went on the navy side. They had said that it was an issue of national security, so because of that the navy was able to keep doing their training and everything else.
Figs Ju
10/8/2018 07:52:17 am
The snail darter was an endangered species that could have been killed off by the building of the Telico dam, but the secretary of interior saw the snail darter as an endangered species. The Court had a 6-3 rule in favor of protecting the snail darter.
olivia baker
10/8/2018 12:28:16 pm
The tenessee valley authority v. hill, in 1973 they found the snail darter and it couldeve been killed off if they kept going throught with their plan. The court ended up having a rule in protecting the snail darter.
nelson
10/8/2018 12:30:17 pm
sonar vs whales. claimed that the sonar sent from navy submarines was harmful to whales. court took the side of the navy because they are our national security and we don't want to endanger our nation
Blake Brown
10/8/2018 12:32:11 pm
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY V. HILL, this is where the animals lost because the dam was still built. It was considered a conservation success because they challenged the courts.
Grace
10/8/2018 12:32:48 pm
In the home builders vs. the defenders of wildlife, the Supreme Court involved so the EPA can monitor the pollution that is being dumped into the water. The court ruled 5-4 in favor of the EPA getting involved to monitor the pollution in water.
Emma Stock
10/8/2018 12:35:15 pm
WINTER V. NRDC: NAVY SONAR AND WHALES
Parks
10/8/2018 12:36:15 pm
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill
max lambert
10/8/2018 12:36:16 pm
The snail darter would have been harmed by by completing the plans to finish the dam but it was taken to court and they put the dam on hold and found that it was more important for the economy to build the dam than to the environment to keep the fish. eventually the dam was built but the delay is considered a environmental win.
Deja
10/8/2018 12:38:18 pm
The Navy Sonar and Whales case started because people were saying that the whales were being hurt by the sonar. The supreme court decided to take the navy's side because they are in charge of protecting national security.
Blue
10/8/2018 12:38:51 pm
The case that I have chosen was Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities For a Better Oregon. The people responding to the case said that under the Secretary’s definition, they were unable to log on their land due to northern spotted owls and red-woodpeckers that were listed as threatened under the ESA.
jamie
10/8/2018 12:41:33 pm
The Nat'l Assoc. Of Home Builders v. Defenders of wildlife, (ESA),(CWA),(EPA) all involved in the moving of water pollutant and trying to make sure that the moving of the water wont effect and already endangered animals
Kinlee
10/8/2018 12:58:30 pm
Babbitt vs Sweet Home.... That the definition of what was unlawful in the Endangered species act made it so they couldn't mark their land because of a few endangered species in that area and they voted a 6-3 majority vote and chose not to change the secretary definition and also chose to create a system that would grant permits to accidental takings
erin teske
10/8/2018 02:27:39 pm
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill: There was going to be a dam built but then was redecided due to the protection of the fish and amended the ESA to think of different economic impacts in decisions.
Myo Ka Zin Soe
10/9/2018 09:00:56 am
WINTER V. NRDC: NAVY SONAR AND WHALES
Sad Nyx
10/9/2018 09:11:17 am
The case pertains to the cleaning of polluted water and those involved with the process, and is about ensuring that the polluted water does not come into contact with endangered animals.
Eleanor Dunning
10/9/2018 09:11:45 am
Winter v. NRDC: Navy Sonar and Whales. In this article, they talked about how the sonar was affecting the whales and that it was in humane. However the Supreme Court had the final say and in the end they decided that the Navy's protection in the end was most important.
Daniel Opperman
10/9/2018 09:17:24 am
In the car of Winter V. NDRC: Navy soñar and Whales. This case was about the Navy was using sonar for military practices which was causing harm to marine mammal. (Stranding on beach was linked to sonar use). The Supreme Court was in favor of the navy
Cole Hays
10/9/2018 09:18:25 am
Lyndon
10/9/2018 09:27:37 am
WINTER V. NRDC: NAVY SONAR AND WHALES
Erica
10/9/2018 09:36:12 am
The National Association of Home Builders v.s. Defenders of Wildlife
Julie
10/9/2018 09:36:25 am
Tennessee Valley Snail Darter
Talia Butler
10/9/2018 09:39:56 am
The submarine/ships are potentially hurting marine mammals that live in the ocean like whales, seals that the navy officers are taking note of. The court ruled by saying th navy will still be allowed to do their job even though it’s affecting the mammals
hunter
10/9/2018 09:45:53 am
Tennessee valley authority vs hill they found snail darters which were considered endangered. they decided to build a dam but they aren't protecting the fish the ESA was amended to consider the economic implications of a plan in order to grant exemptions.
Sydney
10/22/2018 01:26:55 pm
Navy vs. Whales- The supreme court got involved because the navy was using sonar technology that was harming the whales. The court ruled in favor of the navy, claiming that it was a matter of national security. Leave a Reply. |
Environmental Policy Class ForumWelcome to the Forum! Here is where you will be answering your daily warm-up questions. Please do not enter your last name for privacy reasons, and you may use a nickname if you would like (Just make sure Mr. Tredinnick is aware of the nickname you are using). Write out thoughtful responses to the forums on the days they are assigned. If you miss a day please take it upon yourself to complete the Forum you missed. Each Forum has the targeted Learning Objective(s) there so you can see what the focus of the day's class will be. Archives
May 2019
Categories |
RSS Feed